Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Triumph America How Much?

COUNTER

Technical
Year: 2009
Director: Javier Fuentes-León
Writer: Javier Fuentes-León
Country: Peru
Genre: Drama
120 min.
cast Cristian Mercado, Manolo Cardona, Tatiana Astengo

Synopsis Michael is a dear young fisherman of Cape Blanco, a small fishing village on the north coast of Peru, where there deep-rooted traditions about death. Michael is married to Mariela, seven months pregnant with their first child, but has an extremely secret romance with another man Santiago, a painter who moved to town a year ago and is rejected by the people to be agnostic and open about their sexuality. Miguel faces a great dilemma when James accidentally drowns and returns, after death, to ask him to find his body in the sea and bury it, according to the rituals of the people, that his soul rests. To do so would reveal his relationship with James, and ruining his marriage and reputation. Failing which he would sentence him to wander forever.
Michael is forced to deal with the consequences of their actions and accept who he really, although doing so there is a possibility of losing the people you love.
Comment
This movie makes me think about the need for transit through the match against a loss in each of its phases:

1 .- Confusion and disbelief. The denial of reality, a departure from the done to try to mitigate the effects of the event. Michael denies his relationship with James, is something unusual and unacceptable in their community, despite their feelings chooses to live with his wife and is expecting her first child, this life fits into your order and clings to it . Santiago feels a deep affection for and attraction, allowed to reveal in the solitude of the couple, from the secret and internal negation.

2. Deep sadness and aggression. Under pressure from Santiago on one side and gossip emerging from the gossip of the town, his secret is threatened not accepted, Miguel this experience will produce reactions of anger, discontent and anxiety, feeling the protagonist of a disgrace that does not star.

3. Despair and depression. With apathy, sadness and fragility, is realizing how he has to make a vital choice beyond being carried away by momentary impulse, a decision that means losing one of their lives, in this case and denied the hidden life. In pregnancy of the decision, loses his wife and son when he disclosed the relationship with Santiago. Being honest with yourself and therefore with his wife, is the first step of the way for acceptance of his own life, and that's what helps him out of the loop.

4. Acceptance and peace. Is slowly reviving the need to focus on daily activities, be open to social relations, to continue with his life. However, never returns to its state before the loss. After this process, Michael is another, confident, deep, deep, a transformation derived from his own grief and acceptance, today is a man with greater understanding of himself that before the duel.

The film plays with a double death, domestic and physical Miguel Santiago. Strikes me as the film is how we cling to memories emotional response to loss, either death, or separation, not willing to release their loved one died, in this case, Miguel Santiago still had in his mind, talking with , not wanting to let go of him, clinging to his memory and company, and only after the acceptance of his death, and be faithful to fulfill the wish of his friend comes to his funeral and then finally at peace and is released their addiction.

I
I recommend this film, readers, I was transported to an environment of extraordinary warmth and humanity, and a greater understanding of how pain is healing, and how after death there is life.

Raquel Lázaro

Monday, December 27, 2010

Red Bridge Card Reader Rb-539 Driver

MAMMOTH (mammoth)

Technical
Original title: Mammoth
Director: Lukas Moodysson
Country: Germany Sweden, Denmark
Year: 2009
Length: 127 min.
Genre: Drama
Starring: Michelle Williams, Gael García Bernal, Thomas McCarthy, Sophie Nyweide

Movie Synopsis
set in various international settings: United States Thailand and the Philippines. Leo is a man who has achieved success in the gaming industry. And Ellen, his wife, works as a doctor. Both live in New York with her young daughter, who, because their parents are engrossed in their work, spends much time with a nanny named Gloria, a matter that great concern to Ellen, fearful of losing the affection of the child. One day, due to a business matter, Leo must make a trip abroad, and from that moment will be a cluster of events that so deeply affect his family life.

Comments
is a slap in the face of our current reality. Show
personal life in the globalization of the markets. People live fast, disconnected from our reality, and disconnected from our real needs. I bring this film to the artificial need to fill that inner void with activity, hustle and bustle, a vacuum even at the highest occupancy still leaving empty.
This movie makes me thinking of how I think routinely superfluous needs to depersonalize me avoiding contact with my innermost being, and isolated from others, of life.
From the movie I suspect the lack of an I you, barred with the mobile, PDAs and computers, supplanting the visual and tactile communication by digital communication, hampered by the workload is not physical, intellectual, yes.
Reflecting on how I want to be somewhere with people being in another place and with others, and as between this loop appears to me the need for affection, closeness and intimacy, to search for the other, searching for harmony, while I realize that as me from fulfilling my need to pop the bottom, which I meet in my fantasy pseudo, producing a sense of mess, confusion and unhappiness. Shows
globalized world based on consumption in all parts of the world, power and domination, where we stop living life in its fullness to achieve higher status and greater property, amenities, at the expense of not being where we really want be. I realize how I avoid the detail and flavor of the little things, insignificant precisely because the tilde it before stopping to realize them.
Shows lack of commitment to the decisions we make, through infidelity, the film flesh by the reality of circumstances varied.
shows how we are not responsible for the consequences of the decisions we make, I realize how I am or not the responsibility of my life.
There is a clear sequence of this, Western mother is angry with the nurse when she realizes that her daughter is very interested in learning Tagalog (language of the nurse) and their customs.
shows how globalization, the use of technology, the rush, and live away from the present separates us from realizing the reality, and personal care to others, I realize the next step in how I live, I live from what I do, not from what I'm doing, feeling stress, anxiety and dissatisfaction, the expectation I put something else while living, or rarely matches the reality of what I'm living in right now.
shows how all this is a wheel, a vicious circle that is difficult to go out and encompassing all countries regardless of where each one has in this world.
The crisis of the capitalist system in its domestic side.

Friday, December 3, 2010

Quickbooks Premier 2010 Licence Number



technical and artistic
Year 1992
Length: 102 min.
UK Country
Director Kenneth Branagh
Cast Emma Thompson, Kenneth Branagh, Hugh Laurie, Stephen Fry, Alphonsia Emmanuel, Imelda Staunton, Richard Briers, Phyllida Law, Alex Scott, Edward Jewesbury, Rita Rudner, Ann Davies, Tony Slattery, Alex Lowe


Synopsis A group of old friends gather to spend the new year in the company, after being separated for 10 years. Have been called Peter, who has just inherited an English manor of his recently deceased father. I joined them at the time was his fondness for the show, and above all shame.

But over the years their lives have evolved, including their neurosis. So guests are appearing one by one: a parent's death traumatized by one of her twins, a vampire with his latest conquest, a repressed spinster and old-fashioned that takes refuge in books and a Hollywood producer with his pseudo-famous woman obsessed with thinness. The host of this motley crew is Peter, a man in a difficult time in your life wants to be together with those he considers his friends.

Christmas Christmas I live it now, and I understand that is an increasingly widespread sense, as a party based on values \u200b\u200bexclusively consumerist motives disguised as friendly and inclusive. A party that celebrates the wild competitiveness in the image of the universal values \u200b\u200bof brotherhood and love. In short, a quasi-obscene celebration. It is therefore not surprising that the traditional, and in many cases, forced family gatherings and friends, are often tinged with this same hypocrisy. And while listening to the comments of the people in my surroundings it seems a shared conception of Christmas does not seem sufficient reason to assume an attitude change in line with the perceived reality, why not? What keeps us the wheel, knowing that the wheel is flawed? How can we contribute as meek sheep to values \u200b\u200bthat hurt us?

Peter's friends gather to celebrate the New Year together and although they do have as a fundamental Christmas, during the three days we spent together show all the defects found in most families to make up, usually without much success, to contribute to the image of love and unity that is required of us at this time .

The family ... friends
And these eight people are together, that once made sense, at Christmas 1992 in a massive English manor. At the first formal greetings hysterical joy tinged follow them the first flashes of panic each, which will manifest itself until it reaches its maximum expression in each of the guests at different times of the plot, to the point of wondering what they are doing together, and what have gathered. And this is precisely the question that is not just us and it might be healthier than we did at dinner parties and holiday meals. What am I doing here? To which may still others as "Who are these people sitting next to me? What really binds me to link them beyond the familiar? And is this reason enough to come here today and be with them?

These and similar questions could lead us to discover the real motivation of these meetings each of us can give them a sense and a more human and personal value to them, in case this question of reality has continuity in response to the meeting.
In its day this group of friends had it clear, I joined the shame, today, in 1992, having been invited by a dear friend from the past. And for what? Friend's motivation is a desire to be with people who once felt close to share with them a difficult personal situation and possibly for company in this vital moment of solitude.

Friendship And is that despite everything, at times difficult, one needs to be with those who once had a link. Why? I have no answer. I can think of several like being together in the most sterile solitude, to feel heat in a time when reality becomes starkly cold, having a fantasy moment you set foot on the ground before the terrifying vertigo that causes the existential void , a concrete blanket here and now before the black hole of infinite eternity ... I am a skeptical person and although at some point in my life I felt this heat, this soil, this blanket ... in human company, then, when company has spread, when only loneliness has been to keep me company and the only blankets to wrap myself have been have been my bed, real and not metaphorical, I fall into the black hole and I turn and I go black hole, infinite and I feel only terror reminds me that I'm alive and I'm human, then I wonder why the friendship? What is this? who? And above all, is worth living knowing that it is only for a moment?

say that we tend to have two attitudes to life, build for fear of losing, and not have the fear of losing, in both cases what was behind a non-acceptance of the ephemerality of life. Obviously, I'm one of those people who have fears because he knows he will lose and that's painful. I find it hard to accept the pain, I tend to disconnect. But lately I'm daring to live moments of connection and experience the pain it causes me to live here and now, in a world increasingly creepy feeling and I admit powerless and alone. And at the same time, paradoxically, increasingly appreciate more the relationship with others, perhaps because I am more able to appreciate the company in solitude. Also, whenever I feel it is less important to have had a prior relationship with the people I meet for company, because in reality although I sense that some level there is a difference between being with someone I've known for a long time or someone who previously did not know, I see that in its essence, quality and quality of the relationship depends entirely on you and me here and now and in the context in which we find ourselves, whether or not we're together or been before or not later.

ttal Lizarraga

Monday, November 15, 2010

Where Can I Buy Elevenses Clothes

PETER'S FRIENDS LOOKING FOR ERIC (looking for eric)

Sheet and Art:
Original title: Looking for Eric
Director: Ken Loach
Cast: Steve Evets, Eric Cantona, Stephanie Bishop, Gerard Kearns, Stefan Gumbs, Lucy-Jo Hudson, Cole Williams, Dylan Williams
Country: Belgium, Spain, France, Italy, United Kingdom
Production year: 2009

Synopsis Eric Bishop of Manchester is a postman killed by his personal life. Since his second wife left him, is in charge of two teenagers and troubled, who with their irresponsibility will complicate life. The daughter from his first marriage was asked to take care of your baby, and this means that you have to do every day to his first wife, Lily, whom he abandoned for many years without any explanation, and which still in love.
One night in his room, watching a football poster of his idol, Eric Cantona, he wonders aloud how he could face conflicts if it were in place.

Travel
Eric feels overwhelmed and in despair, as well as driving the car out of control, lost control of his life. Given their apparent apathy, coworkers, while friends try to comfort him and when he discovered in a negligent attitude, not only do not judge you but help. In his dismay
invoked his idol, Cantona, who was credited with the voice of his "other-self, his" alter-ego. "
Cantona, a harsh and brilliant footballer of Manchester United now retired, he is trying to messages as they will face obstacles.

Eric is a man living the mistakes as a heavy burden, hindering progress in life. His alter-ego conveys that there are always more options that we just have to try. Nothing is final and see the mistakes and unintended effects but reversible, empowers us to take them as opportunities to apply our experience, and reconciles us with the unpredictability and uncertainty of life.

Eric, the voice of the other-I reveals that the feeling of loneliness is what leads to investigate on the interior to find the target. Eric discovers that communicate the truth of your feelings gives you a clarity and force. And when the need is to say "no", the authority gets to be felt is sufficient to say that it can be.

Eric appears to him the importance of trust in their peers, their friends, the people want, the need to take risks, to share problems to try to solve.
Once there, we dare to ask, to express what's wrong, what I need. Teamwork, friendship, complicity with whom I have at hand is developing as we're showing, and this requires taking the risk to be told "no." Invoking "I can not" ask for shame, pride ... it is just an excuse to avoid giving me a negative response, and this attitude makes me a state of isolation in which, indeed, do not give chance to reject me but do not let me experience that I want to help, I want to give.
In the film, the peer group collaboration is essential for Eric can handle the complicated and risky situation facing.
In life there are times that I can act alone and others that do not. The crux of the matter is to realize that we can not go out alone in the problems, we always need someone to help us. Another very different thing is that what you do, to resolve, is a case to make my own.

The Eric panic attack and gestures to the warnings of his father reveals the deep attachment he has with him. Failure to meet and review the destructive power that the opinion of his father is on it means that you do not own your life. We can exercise our own authority unsuitable to our identity. Eric suffers the consequences of leaving unfinished business and until we resolve it can not grab your life.
The key is to resolve, close and fire. Just listening to my inner voice I meet what I want, then close and it is available to any exchange. If I leave it pending, do not act according to what I live in the present, but what I was awakened by what I had in the past and left unfinished.

"Looking for Eric", with a friendly tone and sentimental, it shows the darkness of the suburbs where the temptation criminal threat, the infamous police brutality, and chronic loneliness families made pieces. And amid all this reveals the need for trust.
Lily, the first woman, to his way of doing things naturally, without artifice, means trust and security that you decide to have. And this real sorry to see it rooted in a hard life like yours.

is, ultimately, a heartwarming story that speaks of self acceptance and overcoming personal problems with the help of others, a witness against the individualism, and how a more cohesive group than the sum of its members.
As in football, teamwork prevails over the individuals.

M ª Esther Santamaría

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Mandingo White Women Story

STAG (Departures) Louise-Michel

technical and artistic
Original title: Departures (Departures)
Director: Yojiro Takita
Actors: Masahiro Motoki, Tsutomu Yamazaki, Ryoko Hirosue, Kazuko Yoshiyuki
Country: Japan.
Year: 2008
Length: 131 min.

us about the experience death. In particular the process of mourning the loss of a loved one. And the death of a style or mode of living with the loss of a profession, dismissal, bankruptcy or cessation of activity. A death as death by loss of social status. A death by suicide. A death by accident. Approaching death watch and learn from different perspectives from which we annealed some insurance.

With each of these deaths are psychological and personal issues that move, the "dying" before he died, and whom or who are still alive after the death of the deceased.

Life and death are choices. Life involves energy, courage, determination, hope, joy of living. Death is the end of it.
death occurs and can also be chosen. What leads us to choose it? Despair, hate, life believing there is no output. Although we also carry things to death, understood death as the cessation or termination of an activity or relationship, when we no longer satisfied. In the case of the protagonist, takes his dismissal from the orchestra to leave his job as a musician, who apparently did not satisfy him and he carried a large financial debt, and decides to return to his childhood home. Closing and starting without being aware of it, a new overture to his life that will take to reinstate their identity on a trip to his childhood, and thus begin his life again.

Death may be more or less consciously, like life. The more aware more full, safe and peaceful. The more unconscious we are more outstanding issues will be resolved and therefore less light, energetic and happy live.

This time I focus on the journey that makes the protagonist to leave his job, die as a professional musician, with all that implies, and return to his childhood home. It is a return journey, and in principle has the support of his girlfriend, who accompanies him.
The hero, Daigo returns home and finds himself without money and with the need to find work. Search and find a job "that helps to travel", granted an interview and will know what it is about work. To his surprise, the job is mortician. Horrified first finds the error in the notice, to deny the evidence, and knocked down and after releasing their new leader a wad of banknotes accepted the job. Silent goes home with money and buy good food for dinner with your partner. The star hidden from his wife back to what happens with regard to his new job.

Daigo Days pass and your new job is closer to the experience of death, from by different states, terrified, in the plague, a section, and finally abandoned. And history repeats itself, again leave him. Meanwhile, his work being accepted Daigo and the experience of death, and above all and through contact with people with whom you work, s comrades, relatives of the deceased and the deceased himself, it enters the sphere of privacy, proximity and contact with other persons, who looks pained, angry, expression and even sticking to the death of a loved one.
At this stage of the film we see the various psychological issues at play in the grief process, which were present in the lives of these people, with conflicts and conflicts that were unresolved and that death emerge. Outcrop guilt, resentment, fear, etc. And, fortunately, for surfacing and being aware of this is the only way to give change. This approach to people and families of the dead is what allows Daigo contact and dynamic with their own psychological issues, which were hidden until this journey and have to surface and changing the emotional tone as the grieving process is giving. Besides these relatives were grateful to him and his boss, the work done with their dead, treatment care and respect they moved. SHOCK
means moving. Daigo As you approach this experience more human crop memories, expressive capacity and shared with coworkers, boss and secretary. Be loving and respectful is what we all need and what it costs us to be when we are imbued with unresolved psychological issues.
In these moments of history his wife leaves him when he learns his new trade. So Daigo is left alone, dedicated to his work in the company of their colleagues. His old world is gone.
In these moments of solitude and companionship with peers, come Christmas. And they share their sadness and anger Daigo for the abandonment of his father as a child. Daigo
shown contempt to the memory of his father, he starts talking about his father, so far said nothing.

's wife dies baths. Daigo had a positive affect and a link to this woman was who and where recourse when she was sad as a child. Daigo to say goodbye to this woman appreciates all given, provided, lived with her, reborn in him the ability to be linked positively with his father, who recalls closely communicated and shared. Daigo now also deliver positive relationship with his wife.

With the death of his father see as Daigo to abandon his father froze on that experience and situation. Frozen blur. Unable to absorb what happened, turning in on oneself. So stuck in this situation of loss and farewell without anchor their way of life, act in life that time and repeat your story over and over again. Deserted him and left him again and again, just as his father. But this time Daigo make a change, to undertake this journey after job loss occurs without awareness, the opportunity to reestablish his relationship with his father.

How is this reconnecting with his father? We first see her resistance, first rejects, refuses, does not, then your co-worker says I do, sharing its experience of abandonment. Are moved, they soften. Daigo, first flees, escapes, full of rage starts to run, stopped, and decides to approach his father.

What happens in reuniting with her father?
Given that people build our identity based on what our parents lived, Daigo to return to his father discovers that his father has not forgotten, and has been present. Daigo then it may hurt and be hurt by the loss of his father, closing the old situation and recover outstanding among other things the importance of himself.
And the new order of life is given. Daigo now has the capacity now positively linked with others.

Supports Daigo in the process, his new boss. A head clear, present, generous, and concise. That welcomes and teaches and who gets to be intimate and equal. His secretary sincere, clear, loving, tender, close and firm. The cello, as a means of attachment, expression and vehicle for contact with the past. His family encouraged him with its freshness and ingenuity to take a trip to the past. Their work and the people you contact and relationship.

to recover and reintegrate our identity we need to close these past situations where we get stuck and make us live a limited, biased and repetitive. In this work therapy to return to a more expressive, shared, and in conjunction with the / s too / s.

This story is an example of outstanding duel, a duel yet done and that makes all life from the confinement, the stubbornness and hatred. And we see as one is opened again to life is to share, expansion, through pain and pleasure in the process of life and bereavement.

Ainara Campos

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Dry Psoriasis Dandruff



Address: Gustave Kervern, Benoit Delépine.
Actors: Yolande Moreau , Lanners, Bwnôit Poelvoorde, Albert Duzontel.
Nationality: France.
Year: 2008.
Duration: 94 min .

factory in somewhere in Picardie, a group of workers out of work, just after the management assured them that despite the rumors, the factory will close. As a show of good faith, gives direction to each of them a robe with his name, a fact that deserves a joint celebration in a pub. The next morning they go to work are that the hangar where the factory was empty.

address has offered compensation. Ten of the workers get together and decide to pool their money and do something with it. Among the actions being considered are: assemble a pizza, make a calendar of them naked and kill the boss. Win this latest unanimously. Hire a hitman to finish off the boss. What end? The revenge I suppose.

This is a strange film, the first word that crosses my mind is "absurd" but not quite right, there is something in it that makes it less absurd than the fact that we have on a daily basis media. I suppose it is unrealistic in terms of exaggerated tone mainly by the number of situations that occur one after another. I guess the right word is surreal.

revenge as a plot certainly is not new, either in film or in life. Revenge against an act of social injustice is also done in a way so dirty, creating unnecessary expectations that make the fall is harder, puts the viewer side of the avenger. And so in this film. It is curious that even the end, when hurt innocent people just do not have a clear what he feels, because by then, it has been fond of these marginal characters after so many shocking situations, has lost the parameters of good and bad socially established .

Its main characters are Louise and Michel. Louise works in the factory is a big woman little awkwardly integrated among workers. She lives alone in a building that is about to be demolished, but as Louise can not read and does not socialize with neighbors, is not entirely until it falls behind a day after losing his job. Is learning to read, teach a child in your neighborhood, but so far has only learned the vowels. Because she is the one who proposed the assassination of the leader and takes care of finding the murderer begins to interact more with people, with the first factory workers and the murderer and his neighbor hired later.

Michel is the assassin. Louise is not who planned to hire but by chance he meets and begins his relationship. This is a lanky man, awkward and sloppy play in espionage and in fact has never killed anyone, nor can to do so, despite the money they offer but has enough cunning and amorality to find a solution.

Both are united by their poverty and marginalization. One difference, Michel lives in a fantasy world of American film while Louise is very realistic, even when the reality is surreal film dyes, takes life as it comes and respond naturally.

One of the key issues that the film portrays the inequality and social injustice. An injustice to which the oppressed, the battered, revolt, say enough. Before the pitorreo to which they are subjected: mint, stripped of their means of life, and "compensation" miserably, they decide to join these "claims" ridiculous and do something useful with them. Something that, while not going to solve life, will indemnify morally, or at least seem to believe. Indeed, the spectator, to see how to load a callous and sneaky characters who have cheated, humiliated and left on the street people in a precarious situation, could not but feel a pleasant energy shock, I guess because a projection of those issues of injustice that I have outstanding and will probably never have occasion to avenge. They say that revenge is not the way, it probably is, but how good you feel when viewed on the screen.

This reflects the social classes the rich are obscenely wealthy and the poor live in abject poverty and marginalization. Everyone seems to be sick, the rich richer diseases: is the great mogul posted to your every minute buying and selling stocks without stopping, objectify people in their surroundings, employees, wife, son ... and playing with them as if lego dolls they were while running the tape of his private gym or soaking up the sun in the hammock by the pool of his mansion, none of which is able to enjoy. We also found the chieftain of the factory that is passed idle days in his dingy office with the illusion of being powerful and having a ball power forward who does the dirty work, the last, lie to the workers about working conditions in which they find themselves. The degree of depersonalization of the social classes is at the point where the headquarters of a business group consists of boxes with the names of each member company, with no humans to be addressed, even to settle.

And are the poor, diseases of the poor: unemployment, lack of money to cover basic needs like food, eviction from their homes, illiteracy, which can lead to situations as grotesque as you can not read an ad that takes three months written on the door of your building you said that he would turn into ashes and you will run out of it and, so soon no longer have a place to live or even a place to go to claim it. So you just have to impotence, the feeling that nothing you can do when your rights are violated shamelessly. Maybe that's why such an extreme measure and unacceptable from a rational point of view, is can be emotionally acceptable.

have few both seem to be afraid of losing it and becoming obsessively collect his world in a mass of lifeless things buying and selling by the piece, the others have so little, how they are powerless remove even the little they have and are the only way out of his impotence false sense of power that can take the life of another person. Both play to be God in his own way, perhaps not to assume that poor or rich, we are powerless over what insurance affords us all, death.

The socially excluded are also a fundamental part of the plot, those people who society wants them to move apart and those spaces are reserved for the most remote and darkest of times. These spaces and the times that otherwise persist in maintaining to visit when our darker ghosts are tired and need rest so much hypocrisy in these margins, airing their shameful and perverse instincts (and unrecognized), allowing us to keep intact the illusion of living in a world of neat and spotless. Thus, among others in the film are manifest ex-offenders, transvestites, the killers, the paranoid recognized transsexuals, the dying, the sick, immigrants and the unemployed ... involved and support the future "official" system and seem invisible in daily life. The film beautifully reflects this in a moment in which Louise and Michel asked a street address a pedestrian dressed and he continues to walk as if even acknowledged its existence. The effect it has on me is the existence of two parallel planes of reality in terms of space and time that can not communicate. For the poor rich and the poor are the rich like a robot who does not get his voice. For each of the other is a ghost.

a spectator
My sympathy is certainly with the poor and marginalized even as they cross the line of what is morally acceptable to me. Unfortunately, I have to confess that in my daily life I'm closer to the PLC hypocritical that helps maintain your lifestyle with poverty and marginality, that, as Laurie Anderson says, "is silent in three different languages" and agree with my silence and inequality and social injustice.

This film is dedicated to Louise Michel, a prominent French anarchist who was one of the leading figures of the Paris Commune (brief insurrection that occurred in 1871 and ruled the city of Paris for three months and that universal suffrage was introduced and a common political project self-managed), and was tirelessly committed to social causes and all those policies aimed at achieving equality and social justice. Also, was a poet, writer and educator. While the movie does not play directly the facts of the life of Louise Michel, does have aspects that reflect the tone of his life.

ttal Lizarraga

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Jobs For Integrative Pharmacology Masters

WISDOM GUARANTEED (Erleuchtung garantiert)

technical and artistic
Original Title: Erleuchtung garantiert
Address: Doris Dörrie.
Country: Germany.
Year: 2000.
Duration: 89 min.
Interpretation: Uwe Ochsenknecht, Gustav-Peter Wöhler, Petra Zi.
Photo: Hans Karl Hu.
Assembly: Inez Regnier and Arne Sinnwell.

is the story of two brothers, two people dissatisfied and lost, one by choice and another practically pushed by circumstances, undertake a trip to Tokyo that they will find themselves.

Gustav is a man interested in the spiritual and personal knowledge. Practice meditation and feng sui expert. In his search for inner peace decides to travel to Japan where you want to stay in a Buddhist monastery.

On the other hand, his brother Uwe, a father, a selfish man, macho, seller of cuisines is abandoned by his wife, who one morning, without warning, leaving home with her four children leaving a note that says he does not seek it.

Uwe in his unconsciousness, it is totally surprised and alone, and desperate calls his brother for comfort and comes in your house just the night before he set off.

Fear and insecurity
Gustav is a man insecure and fearful. One of his greatest fears is being lost, and it is precisely this what happens in Tokyo, one of the busiest cities in the world where they do not speak your language well. And as happens in most catastrophic fantasies become reality when are more bearable than it previously thought. At first with his brother, but then only and no money, find a way to eat and even socialize. When the need to tighten ...

However, this is just the beginning of Gustav trip to the depths of fear and insecurity, because the greatest fear is what is inside, that is anchored in the body and originates in childhood or traumatic experiences. In this case, it is the fear of not doing well, err, which paradoxically leads to mistakes over and over again and suffer unnecessarily. Therefore, this journey is an inward journey that will perform with his brother and Buddhist monks of the monastery in which they are withdrawn. It is a journey without which it would acquire consciousness of fear with which he lives from day to day and unable to comprehend his life.

Questions for reflection:

I find it interesting to note the existence of cultures where it is known how to break through the fear, and integrate it into the person that it has the function for which there , alert the real danger to avoid. That is, you're not at the mercy of fear, is fear that makes the work of reporting potential dangers to which one decides whether or not to respond.

On the other hand, there are other cultures, like ours, where fear is used as a tool for control and subjugation, ie, it promotes being at the mercy of fear, and lost all reference the real dangers and thus casting off the power of conscious decision and action regarding our lives.

There
two, and both are known on the planet. And I wonder how the West is that we chose to live afraid? How is it that we prefer to submit, to be free? Are we paralyzed by fear? Is it possible to evade the fear of injection strategies designed deliberately?

abandonment and loss
Uwe suffers an unexpected loss, his wife suddenly leaves home with her three children. Is unexpected for him because, it seems, the glass of patience or tolerance for attacks on Petra, his wife, has been filled drop by drop, day after day, to overflowing, has had enough.

But while such decisions will gradually surmised, the act itself happen overnight and in this case because she goes by surprise in the morning to go Uwe has a wife and three children and when he returns in the afternoon anymore. There is no option to reply to petitions or questions, anything, in fact, is not aware that something went wrong in your marriage or even their level of aggressiveness or degrading treatment towards his wife.

currently
him, incredulous, he begins to mourn and calls his brother for comfort, brother, with whom the other hand, seems to have more respect. But Uwe not someone share their emotions may not account friends circled those entrusted therefore currently in which is overcome emotional bond comes closest to his brother.

Uwe passes through the stages of grief and rage after the first denial. At first you can not believe what has happened, take a camera and goes from it to his wife, perhaps in an attempt to fill this need to understand, replicate, question, or at least be heard. Fantasea talking to her in an attempt to deny his absence and it is possible to do virtual addressing is she ever has done with the meat and bone Petra.

later come to rabies. Rage, rage, rage, rage ... to be felt in all its fullness to pass through. And it will be the trip is Uwe, who has needed it leave to be aware of their anger and debug.

Questions for reflection:

"Life gives you what you want but you need", this is something I heard a while ago from the mouth of a movie director when asked if he thought he would win the Oscar for which it was nominated. While this statement may, wrongly in my opinion, an excuse for not fully grieve the frustration that can result in the loss, it is also true that sometimes we need something painful happens, something beyond our control and there is no turning back. For it is these situations that we're left with no anchors which we used to settle our comfortable existence and force us to ask our lives differently, to change and decide to live more consciously and fully.

The change involves pain and discomfort, and although this was always difficult, there is increasingly less room for change in a society run to comfort, to keep giving us useless anesthetized and nursing fantasies of being that we do not quench but keep us in the illusion of being well fed. So we become greedy children who never have enough, and we're moving away After losing more of our needs and our basic and fundamental to reach a full and satisfying hunger. That is, we know how hungry we are, and how we are hungry and happy to let you know what it is to drink a glass of cold water when we are hungry or eat a hot meal when we're hungry. And it is no coincidence, then yes we cover a need, greed and power hunger of those who play God with the sole purpose of maintaining the fantasy of escape and death.

Two brothers
These two brothers are so different, of course, common ground, one is the decoration, which involved both professionally, but each in its style, and another is the great unconsciousness about themselves and their family and couple relationships.

So far both seem to believe that their family lives are going well, while their women are dissatisfied and seek each their own way out of this dissatisfaction. Uwe discover the reality of hit and feels the need to do something about drifting in this moment of vulnerability for the circumstances and joining the journey of his brother. On the other hand, Gustav seems to feel some dissatisfaction in his spiritual life that leads him to search for something different.

Both brothers are accompanied in their individual pursuits, which are intertwined not only at present but also its root, since each one has influence in some way in shaping the character of the other and that is how it mixes yesterday and today, helping to purify and unknown.


Questions for reflection:

In this film East and West agree on several levels: a German oriental practices introduced in Western life, two Germans live during a time in a temple Buddhist doing their personal process and adapting to the custom of the monastery, we see a country like Japan in rural areas that coincide with their customs easternmost austere and slow rhythms with the more Westernized Tokyo, full of encouragement and extremely fast.

And I wonder, what is East and what is west? Japan is East, an austere east and east loaded slow and fast. West Germany is a western fast food and disconnection with the inner world, and a meditator western perspective that incorporates energy in its decoration. Or East all it represents the yin and yang, inner wisdom, connection with the unit, the complex in simplicity. Or is the West's speed, disconnect the drive,

I have no answer, I suspect that this is not the question. I guess the question to me is what I want in my life?, Do I want to be connected or alienated?, "I feel the connection with all or live fragmented?, Do I want to live fast or slow?, What am I willing to do or what I'm willing to give up to follow the path you choose? I guess the question is how hungry I am and what I have hunger.

ttal Lizarraga

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

What Does Scabes On Stomactach Mean

THE POLYTECHNIC (Polytechnique)

Sheet
Original Title Polytechnique
Director Denis Villeneuve
Actors Maxim Gaudette, Sébastien Huberdeau, Karine Vanasse, Evelyne Brochu, Pierre -Yves Cardinal, Jonathan Dubsky, Marina Eva, Nathalie Girard, Pierre-Xavier Martel, Johanne-Marie Tremblay
Country Canada
Genre Drama, Historical
Year 2009

This film tells the massacre of fourteen women on December 6, 1989 at the Ecole Polytecnique Montreal.
The murderer, a student center, enters a classroom shooting at the ceiling and ordered that women be made to the left and right men. Men should go out leaving the women with him. These obey without saying anything (except one of them makes a hint of approaching the murderer to see if you can do) and go. To be alone with them tells them they are there because they are feminists and he hates feminists. One tries to protest but as soon as he opens his mouth he shot at close range and breaks down, does the same with the rest. Then leave the room and leaves. The murderer begins to walk around the school with his gun and still shooting exposed women who cross his path. Finally commits suicide.

is premeditated murder. As he tells himself, several years earlier had tried to enter the military service to gain access to a gun but did not succeed, so he continued to live with the sole purpose of getting a weapon and ultimately ending the lives of several women . Before the event write a letter explaining his hatred for women and another to his mother saying he loves. I wonder if we need to dump our anger at faceless women order to have the fantasy of wanting to see the only woman in all, our mother.

film is raw, hard and cold, both in terms of content and form. Is shot in black and white, and she just no room for any kind sound, musical or cozy, only silence filled with tension, dry shots, anguished vocals and choppy breaths. It is a brutal film.

Not having ever experienced a dramatic situation, which is personally connect with all cases of overt or subtle aggression that I have suffered by men throughout my life. It feels visceral, primitive. After the movie walk down the street and I feel hatred for the people I meet. At that time are all those people that before the attack on a woman close their eyes or look away in all the ways you do this, downplaying, hiding, doing nothing even when they sense the gravity of the situation. I have a feeling of unreality, and at the same time I think it's more real than reality my eyes. While I hate what causes the condemnation of the aggression, I identify with the murderer by the mere fact of feeling it as intensely as if it is a hatred associated with the "other" sex.

And in the movie when the men leave the classroom and leave women with the murderer will not really know what to do because when the camera came with one of them is that life at school as usual, public areas like the living room or dining room are filled with people smoking and talking animatedly and not see anyone running or sounding the alarm. This guy runs himself, down to the first floor where a security guard and tells him to call the police, he initially believed that this is a joke.

And I wonder how people who have left the classroom does not have shouted warning of what is happening, either we all rush out of the building to a possible attack of the aggressor or to do something in defense of women who have stayed with him. I find it really brutal feeling that something very serious is happening in a classroom building and the rest of the world continues as if nothing had happened. I feel helpless.

The film is told from three perspectives: that of the murderer, the one of the men who was in the classroom and the only survivor of the same. Three lives are affected forever by this event.

begins with the murderer. They are the moments before the murder in the apartment he shares with other students. Write a letter to feminists that goes against their hatred. I hate it considers causes of discrimination experienced by men today, justified by the social disadvantage that are perceived to suffer them. Then write a farewell letter to his mother leaving the house for this and finally addresses the polytechnic where the tragedy happen.

I do not know what to say about this young man. A loner, who by appearance could pass for a normal person (well if it exists, but at least half a neurotic, not a murderer). You see your relationship with your roommate where you get a list of little contact, some rather cold warmth hello and goodbye. And I wonder what the roommate will think when he finds out? I think I would ask how is that I never thought that something like this could happen.

And I can question my blindness to the behavior likely to lead to a situation of serious aggression. I sing in my work, a secondary education college, when I see aggressive behavior by describing to students denounced what they did, the consequences it has had and saying what I think about what happened (I'm usually very honest and hard on this.) However, I treat them with kindness because some want to believe that their behavior is due to a bad deal that they are suffering or have suffered at the hands of adults and treating them with utmost respect and trying to understand them can change. Watching the film I get to wonder if this way I have to relate to aggression is not wrong and if somehow I'm not contributing.

In my ethics class we talked a lot about love, aggression, human values, exploitation, individual and social responsibility ... and it is precisely these students the most is "wet" reviewing and contributing to their personal experience . Therefore, are the ones who get better grades in it besides being who more attention receive from me.

In the evaluation sessions, that is, when we gather to put the notes, almost all are critical to them and their rebellious behavior and "quasi-criminal" (drug use, bad answers, lack of motivation, ...) . So, what exactly is the subject of ethics which get top marks, and also they, the whole class, those who excel in this subject is at least contradictory. However, I appreciate what they do in my class and I can not fail to assess participatory and sincere attitude in them. However, if rationally seem right to me sometimes when I listen to the experiences some other teachers I can not help thinking if I could be wrong.

thing that calms me in this regard is that I have encountered several situations of bullying taking place at recess with younger children. Who did the bullying? If one of these guys, but along with several that are "good students" and those who do not say anything. What is a good student? Getting good grades and do not respond to the teacher. These same professors who are scandalized work answers that question, do not seem moved by the attacks that happen in the yard, or only if someone puts forward crudely. In fact, not even bother to look, they're too busy trying to catch who smokes and who does not.

not stand the situations in which a group of people with more strength exercises violence against a smaller number and / or weak, it activates something in me that puts me in defense of the attack even if this means going against myself. At school I feel that these students are Bullin in some way by some teachers and that puts me in a position to defend, and maybe be here my blindness, my obsession for her protection may not be seeing the rest of the students in the class, or you may not see the violent behavior they have in all dimension.

follows the vision of one man who left the classroom in which women are kidnapped. When the murderer tells them to divide a moment of confusion he uses to approach the murderer, it seems that to see if you can take the weapon or reduce in any way. But the murderer realizes and chides him to leave.

After leaving in a hurry to go downstairs where there is a security guard and tells him to call the police because a man with a gun is held to a group of women in a classroom. Get back. Along the way, is two women on the ground, one is still alive, So going for medicine to try something. When she returns she is dead. Realizing that the murderer has left the first room, go there to see what has happened. By entering, all women are lying on the ground motionless, including her two friends. When you exit there, runs the building. Now the atmosphere is different, everyone is running from side to side on the alert. At one point, he sees the murderer in a hallway and is sheltered by entering the first door is at hand, and enters a room with music at full blast and smoking and drinking students who are oblivious to everything that is happening outside. This scene I find tremendous it reminds me of a personal fear, be I calmly enjoying something happens something serious or even catastrophic as the movie and I was not aware of anything. It is a self enjoying the misfortune of others to external group.

man back. The next thing you see is going to visit his mother and committed suicide after the visit. Later we see how he finds that one of the friends who had given up for dead only wounded and carried on a stretcher while he apologizes. She tells him that he is not guilty. And certainly he is not guilty and does everything he can to help but he does feel that it is, and I, and even host of the movie, sorry, I guess that's the cultural role of protection that we attribute to men, that there is some guilt in him as a man who was there and did not protect women. Finally, it seems that due to the fault or perhaps other reasons, can not integrate what happened and rather die than to live with it. Therefore, we can say that the murderer, and protective responsibility society places on men, killing one man.

Finally a survivor tells us what he lived and how they live with it since. This young woman is studying to be an aeronautical engineer. The day of the event just had an interview Working for an intern position in a company aircraft. In the interview notes once again the issue of gender, the interviewer questioned his candidacy for the position by being a woman and be more likely than men to leave the job or disregard it to a family, ie children. Know what she responds to this observation, we know that finally get the scholarship.

Upon leaving the interview is your best friend and roommate who studied with her. Come into class with your partner and above all when it happens.

When the murderer left the classroom, she opens her eyes and see around. Her friend and another of women breathe. She is badly injured but can be moved, the other not. Limping out of the classroom for help, to reach the next door is the murderer and think he has seen. Back as fast as you can into the classroom and lies down to rest. The next thing I hear is someone walks into the classroom. It is thought the murderer but no, his friend who is seeing them think they are all lying dead leaves. Finally the other die.

Several years after the event is seen living with a partner and working in an aerospace company. That is when he learns she is pregnant. This news was stirred for so that feels the need to write a letter to the parents of the murderer of the polytechnic even when he knows that it is not sent. In terror she tells them that like to have this child, tells how everyone was saying after what happened and how strong he was said to be tired of being strong, he is thorough. Decides to have her baby and says that if you teach children to respect and appreciate life and girl if she can be whatever you want. Again, the gender difference.

Does it make sense that this woman who has suffered in their own flesh the terrible consequence of gender differentiation, ie to see before the sex of the person your quality as a person continues to have expectations based on gender differentiation? I dare say, at least without further thought about it, that the distinction itself is the cause of prejudice and hatred that comes from them, but the attitude of exclusion with which we approach this differentiation helps this hatred and in consequence, such acts of murder, to be permanently excluded.

ttal Lizarraga

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Female Wrestling Outfits



technical and artistic
Director: Pan Nalin.
Countries: France, India, Italy and Germany.
Year: 2001.
Length: 145 min.
Cast: Shawn Ku (Tashi), Christy Chung (Pema), Neelesh Bavor (Sujata) Jamayang Jinpa (Sonam).
Written by: Pan Nalin and Tim Baker.
Music: Cyril Morin.
Photo: Rali Ralchev.

Synopsis The film chronicles the transformation of Tashi, a Buddhist monk in Ladakh, Himalaya, after his return to the convent where he grew up and are being trained as a monk, after a long period of retreat in the Sacred Cave, which has been retired meditating for more than three years.

Transformation and Development Process
The film shows in detail how it is and there is the process of transformation, of change, reintegration and rehabilitation, at all levels, to its new status after return retirement and after his trip search later.

in therapy and meditation will energize the issues that shape our individual, organizational level and more subtle level, personality and even character. And this dynamic is what enables us to change, grow and advance.

These issues are the object of our work, what we see, what we serve, and to this end, developed the attention, and consciousness from consciousness. To realize them and assume ownership changes and needs. When, as in the case of Tashi, these issues erupt in a violent way or cathartic rush changes and need a permit to be channeled to a profound change.

Normally nobody in our surroundings we withdraw as long as in the movie, this would produce a great influence and effect on the person and not everyone is ready to withdraw from that. "You've gone too far" - tells his teacher to be reunited with him after retirement. There are ways of working in therapy and also to meditate. More cathartic, where the incision and the approach goes to the limit quickly, and accompanying the person according to their flow, without pushing. It is important to reach the limit, do not pass it, because it shows the limits of the person, ability, current and indicates the time of actual development. When they cross that boundary is more complex reintegration of the person and the assimilation of experience in all its magnitude.

Tashi If we see the return of the withdrawal is started on the transformation, which strives to be, which is manifested in his wet dreams in your search and absorption in the sensuality of life. He seized the color of a leaf, the clinking, sound and movement of hands that serve food.

The development of attention, contemplation, absorption
Being attentive to that which draws our attention, which is significant, and guide us and flow through it gives meaning to our existence. Is the significant, and has a message for each one of us, if we agree to it, giving our full attention and our full experience, watching what we observe, is something external, like a leaf, a sound, etc.., or something internal as a thought or an emotion, etc.., with total dedication.

So we developed the ability to see life with fullness, including in our experience, new aspects such as the sense of touch, taste, considering the sound, moisture or shine we're watching.

meditation and therapy have an amplifying effect of the experience. What that allows us account more easily than (we) occurs. One notes, and looks more clear, crisp. Allowing to realize and live every experience with greater breadth and completeness. So we also realize those aspects of our person, which were hidden, and now to see them, recognize them and the like, can recognize and acknowledge more fully.

The work is to give out to it with what you have connected and what you need, but you can agree or not at first, but will bring more bustle, movement and uncertainty, and Final empty. Vacuum of not knowing what comes next, what and how it is.

Tashi see in their difficulty to accept and take care of their urgent need to undertake, and decides that a journey of discovery that will satisfy and meet their wants, that somehow we are pushing to undertake the journey. And on this trip, you will also find self-unfriendly aspects, which were more or less hidden until now and to self-limiting and do suffer. These issues emerge clearly when Tashi leaves the status quo, the land and way of life and being known by him in the convent and is brought into play with their new desires, needs and concerns.

People live in a constant process and change. Change and grow in terms of openness and integration of new states in ourselves. When the process is tight and sick leave to grow.

Both
therapy as conducive to meditation first observation status and perception of our processes, thus promoting the development of conscience in pursuit of that constant flow according to our time, status and needs.

process satisfying a need
The meditative state is a state that allows us to see our ways of doing, feeling and thinking and how they create patterns between repeating itself and send in our lives. With the development of this capacity to realize these patterns can be gradually becoming more aware of them, being more aware of ourselves and take ownership of them and of ourselves and our actions.

Regarding Tashi process for the assumption of its necessity, we can see the first part of the denial of the need supported and enhanced by teachers trying to avoid. A phase of assumption of the need and demand for the same in a rebellious and proud, claiming his teacher the right to learn from his own experience. After all a learning process based on an implementation of the action. With the next surge of similar needs to their satisfaction and withdrawal nuevamnete the convent.

Each can observe and develop the ability to observe the cycle of meeting the need that as more mature and healthy we will be more fluid and satisfying. And depending on how we will or other nuances.

The film with its slow pace and with few words favors this meditative state that I encourage. With care, every image, detail, sound.

Ainara Campos

















Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Free Galleon Ship Blueprints

SAMSARA LOST IN TRANSLATION

Sheet
Address Sofia Coppola
Production Sofia Coppola, Ross Katz, Francis Ford Coppola
Screenplay Sofia Coppola
Music Kevin Shields
Lance Acord Photography
Mount Towako Kuwajima, Tomomi Nishio
cast Bill Murray, Scarlett Johansson, Anna Faris, Giovanni Ribisi

The title plays on several meanings. "Lost in transportation," he highlights the sake of argument, two travelers Americans who do not know each other, match in Tokyo temporarily. One is actor advertising and has traveled to film a clip from a Japanese whiskey. The other with her husband, a photographer for bands and actors who are on a tour. Both are being found in the hotel you are staying.

The other meaning, "Lost in Translation" has several levels. On the one hand it refers to the situation of two Westerners in Japan, immersed in a world culturally and linguistically unfamiliar with difficulty establishing personal relationships with residents. The director of the film itself has said that this situation has personally experienced, led him to explore the needs of a human being in such circumstances.
In general, travelers to work and Tourism accommodated, although English can move with relative ease by any country in the world, the field of communication tends to be limited to environments for travelers and hotels, some tourist attractions, some restaurants, taxis, etc, and not given to engage everyday with people who you are. The director takes this fact with another related phenomenon, namely that it is creating an affinity and complicity between guests of the hotel or between people who agree common places for passengers, of course, leaving the tour group context in which relations are closer.

For a solo traveler in such circumstances, the cultural gap and the inability to communicate in daily life, even for basic needs, makes the confusion grows. Although on a practical level is achieved with basic adjustment on the environment, there may be experiences of disorientation to a more internal level, related to the customs, lifestyle, social values, etc.. On the other hand, the confinement will emerge by feelings of loneliness that have a cumulative effect over time. While a lonely days may be appealing to almost anyone, discovering unusual places, proving in novel situations, etc. novelty game ends soon, tourist interest is high and the traveler begins to need personal relationship. Many people have sought ability palliative company, to "go in search" of a relationship even
surface. And in any case there is always the appeal of the company available in a commercial sense of the relationship. But in the case of our players that are unhappy.

So, as part of this process that explores the film, the characters begin to establish a distant relationship, based on the coincidence in public areas (the lobby, elevator, cafe or nightclub, etc.) . Little by little creating a "sense of belonging", a certain "sameness" shared "neighborhood travel, affinity and complicity for observation allows us to recognize in the other the same difficulties as you pass. Thus this approach and encourages the encounter. However, the "contact" in these circumstances is subject to constraints of the status of the traveler, mutual anonymity, timeliness, discretion and respect, etc.. Any approach beyond the "right thing" might break the thin thread of human contact.

The film shows a process of rapprochement, a process of personal contact. Simultaneously, the dislocation in which they live, that distance of the known world, that feeling in solitude against the unknown and alien world, leads them to consider from this new perspective that everything is based on his life, his supporters, their meanings, their values. And in a way make contact with a loneliness greater, with a certain absurdity of life, with a lack of meaning in their lives, say the universal and existential meaninglessness. Found within himself the self-deception, dependency, and enter into crisis delusion and attachment to various elements of "ordinary life."

This unveiling of existence, the protagonists are engaging in a dialogue process help them little by little, day by day to unravel the protections that are implicit lifestyles assumed to be necessary and appropriate. And this occurs at the same time presenting each of them will, knowing, wondering and wondering, in a dialogue of confidences about their troubles, frustrations and disappointments.

The characters are male and female, heterosexual, and the relationship that arises and moves by the need to contact, is devoid of any sexual charge, going off the topic of sex as a compensator of loneliness and anxiety about the meeting with oneself. Over time, the film flirts with that possibility, but is gradually highlighting their greatest need is on record of friendship, not lasting, just the sincere friendship of the I-Thou encounter.
In contrast, there are nods to some sexopatologías of love as they are, in general, relations reified and turned into an object, the type of prostitution, compulsive sex, sex punitive, the commercial company and all related pathologies narcissism and borderline personality disorders (low self-esteem, unstable identity and regard the other as a useful object to meet our needs and purposes.)
However, the relationship that are engaging our characters are real, human, personal. They are each identified in certain areas and this is allowing them to treat themselves with humanity and mutual respect. Dialogue with each other they sound in their own internal dialogue and helps to clear in the emerging crisis.

A second meaning of "Lost in Translation." Is that its two protagonists are on two ends of a single network of lifelines. He enters his fifties, her twenties. He is back on many things, the crisis of middle age advanced, the question of what one has done or / and is doing with her life, she is beginning, making decisions about the course of your life that will determine the course of their future, the uncertainty of being right or wrong, or miss the best options for his life, a crisis of uncertainty. He has a family that has just tune except superficial and custom, a woman dumped in the decoration of domestic life, a personal relationship almost exhausted, she is starting a consolidated relationship with an absent husband, dedicated to work and other hobbies. He does not know if it's too late to change your life and let go of everything, she does not know if it is too early to change and drop what you have to choose. He has sacrificed his vocation as an actor to work on what matters most gives money, she has sacrificed her career to accompany her husband.

Both, regardless of the displacement in a foreign culture, bringing within it the seeds of a personal crisis, with much of evolutionary crisis (of his age), manifested by disorientation, loneliness and empty. Indeed in Japan, where traditional two topics of their culture: the emptiness and hacinación, austerity and overstimulation, the not-doing and the frantic activity and business enterprise. In the land of the rising sun, our characters suffer from insomnia, and is the night that leads them to be.

Their lives need to be translated to the language of an age and a time to the other. This translation is given during the meeting between the two. Each is nourished by the vital perspective of others and mutual confrontation. One reflects on the youth and the other on maturity, one about freedom and the other on the commitment, enthusiasm and one on another on the hyper-realism, etc.

The relationship goes through the topics of age, by the adventure, parent-child dimension (without dyes Oedipus), and is coming to the friendship in its deepest sense. He finds his soul personified (intrinsic polarity female), she finds her animus personified (polarity intrinsic male). And a love story emerges. In the form of friendship, a relationship open and genuine at the time, knowing that will not last. Both have shaped their lives, the change or not, will follow after them. And the meeting did not lead them to continue living together. They know.

And yet, it's time to say goodbye. Both are slow to acknowledge the love they have found in the other and just politely say goodbye. And after the departure in the style of the best romance in the movies, he turns to look, this time to declare their mutual love, in a final kiss, and re-separated, almost certainly never to be seen anymore. In fact, a antiromántico final.

The film poses the existential situation of being lost @ y, as it says in its advertising slogan: "everyone needs to be found." Or be in and the other, which is the same.

Juan José Díaz

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Mount And Blade How Large Can Your Party Be

The Saints Are Coming or

download

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Nero Vision Express3.1.0.21

Seraphin

technical and artistic
original title Séraphine
Director Martin Povost
Cast Yolanda Moreau, Ulrich Tukur, Anne Bennet,
Francoise Lebrun, Gneviéve Mnich, Nico Roger, Adélaïde Leroux, Serge Lariviere.
Genre Drama, Biography
Duration 125 min.
Nationality France
Year 2008

Synopsis
tells the story of Seraphine Seraphine de Senlis Seraphine Louis or as known in the art world, artist drawn in naive painting, or as called Wilhelm Uhde this current, modern primitive painting. The film shows the artist's life since he met Wilhelm Uhde, the dealer and art critic who discovered and released until his death.

central theme of the film:
As the director says this "is a film about people, about the meaning we can give to life and very little inner wealth. Is the inner life of contemplation, the inner mind development, creation and, in a sense, love. "

Questions for Reflection:

Call
Séraphine receives a call from his guardian angel who tells him he has to devote himself to painting. 40, no experience in this field leaves his job cleaning the convent and goes to live in the village to fulfill his plan. Perhaps his devout character, Seraphine is what your inner voice tells him without hesitation, not raises another possibility. There are many historical figures considered visionaries who hear an internal call to guide them in their work, it comes from something or someone greater than themselves, some call it God, some inner voice, others beyond. So it was with Socrates and Gandhi.

And I wonder Is there a difference between the visionary and the lunatic, and if there is, what is? How far is crazy to hear the call and follow it? When is a visionary in loco for society? How can we determine when an idea is a vision or madness?

Art as a way of life
Here Séraphine turns his inner world in art, and this art happens to be what gives meaning to his life, as if brought to the world of living in this plane of reality where we are, messages from other worlds that connect us with our most intimate and genuine. This gives meaning to his life and lets you go through the conventional terrestrial and go beyond what is established, showing a hardly find absolute fulfillment in our lives humans alienated.

And I wonder where is the sense of my life? Where is the sense of the lives of people close to me or I meet on the street? I can not imagine more fully to find the meaning of life of each and take it to the final. Why not tell us this in school? Why not tell us about this media? What we do not educate ourselves to find meaning in our lives? As well seen in the film, when one knows what to do to find the means to do so. Can you know what is the meaning of your life since childhood when most hear the word "no"?


Body-Soul-Body
society. Seraphine is fully in contact with your body and your body is with nature. When walking barefoot in the grass when the wind caresses your face when climbing trees or when introduced into the stream, every cell of his being seems to absorb what is around him.
seems that through the sensations when in contact with nature Séraphine is transported to another dimension, to a distant world, which brings us back as news through his paintings, the news is intense, colorful, cool, cloudy, divine, carnal ... Because while painting is there and he is here at the same time, is there in soul and is here in the form of hands that interact with specific objects, such as canvas, paints and brushes. At such times it is the channel, the channel between the world of soul and the world body. She is fused body and soul.

Alma. Seraphine is a religious woman who seems to be in close contact with his soul. Has spent many years serving in a convent of nuns who established a very close and positive relationship, which may have facilitated its full confidence in the "divine" in the intangible, in the call. Is devoted to the Virgin, a figure who carries with him everywhere as a guide or support and vital contact with his soul.

Company. Women of low social status who has worked all his life and probably would not have felt the tuck of the adults in your child, you receive a constant derogatory treatment of the inhabitants of his village. She knows who she is and what is his place and he knows how others are. Is suspicious and again and again gives reason to reaffirm their attitude. Finally, he gives up this society and took refuge in the past, too many broken promises that prevent their full and genuine participation is a socially recognized. Or maybe it is society that the casts, the deviation in excess of the "right" of acceptability.

And wonder how You can leave impregnated by nature, be a channel, in a world where there are fewer natural areas and those near the cities are full of contaminants such as pylons harmful living organisms? Can you contact with your soul when you walk down the street of a city or a village, you assail its frenetic rhythms, their lights and sounds aggressive canned? Are they compatible contemplation and speed? Is not the speed a tool used consciously to alienate and turn away from our most intimate nature?

Create-Exhibit
There are two distinct phases in the creative process of this artist. One is the creation. She needs to create and create, at any rate. Does what is necessary to fulfill his plan. At this stage it is, nature and society, the latter as a resource through which to get the necessary tools for the job.

The second phase is exposure, the debut of creation. Spinning with his philosophy of life, the great exhibition represent the display between two worlds, the divine and human, and probably the integration of both in his person. She began exhibiting her paintings individually, beginning to know the people, who responded positively. But the great exposure that she hopes does not occur, at least not at the expected time, and the impossibility of integration crosses the boundary.

Are the creative process and the exposure time or two separate aspects of creation is not complete if there is no exposure? Is it necessary recognition to achieve full social absolute? "The commercial side of art alienates the artist?

ttal Lizarraga